Fountainheadinvesting

Categories
Technology

Tesla: Why I’m Buying on Declines Between $160 and $190 Despite Margin Pressures and Competition

Tesla (TSLA) Buy on declines $160-190

I own Tesla and have been holding it patiently.

Tesla has operating margin compression from 16% to 9% and there is no way they can continue to grow without sacrificing margins, otherwise, they get saddled with excess production capacity and inventory – which are equally bad problems. There’s far more competition, Chinese demand is lower, and suddenly you’re looking at it as an auto company with all its associated auto industry problems and a lower multiple.

I guess the main question is how much of it is already in the price – Tesla has dropped 33% from its 52 week high of $300, and rebounding from $182.

Earnings – Priced at 59x with 24% growth, about 10% overpriced.

Sales – 5.5X sales with 18% growth – also overpriced, because it doesn’t have the tech operating margins anymore and even in the best case will go to 15-16% of sales.

That said – it is far ahead in innovation and scale and very likely remain so in spite of the Musk personality and the various chemicals that go with it.

Categories
Market Outlook

The Anomaly of Interest Rate Movements: Are Markets Disregarding the Fed?

The anomaly of interest rate movements

  • Are markets not believing the Fed?
  • The 10 year treasury dropped from a high of 4.195 on 1/25 to 3.942 today, 01/31 – the day the Feds and Chair Powell was clearly signaling no chances of a rate cut at the March Fed meeting.
  • Intuitively the yields should have gone up – is there something else at play.
  • I believe Yellen’s dovish nod on 1/29 was the main catalyst for the drop in rates and clearly that seems to be overriding Chair Powell’s comments after the FOMC meeting.

Simply, if the government decides it needs to borrow more, it doesn’t get to borrow at cheap rates; the private sector will naturally charge more, which means interest rates go up. Now if Powell’s boss signals that borrowing will be a) less than anticipated this quarter b) borrowing intervals and amounts will be regularly spaced out, it’s a clear dovish signal that the government doesn’t want interest rates going up in an election year.

Categories
Stocks

AMD’s Resurgence in the AI Market: Is It Time to Invest?

AMD has been mostly relegated to second tier status because of Nvidia’s massive leap in AI related data center revenue, which catapulted it from $27Bn in sales the previous  year to $57Bn in 2023, this year and an estimated $90Bn in 2024.

However, AMD is a scrappy competitor and I have a lot of respect for Dr Lisa Su, who’s transformed this company from a commodity CPU/GPU semis supplier to game consoles and PC’s to a solid competitor in the data center segment. Most of Intel’s market share losses can be traced to AMD’s strengths!.

While Nvidia is likely to continue getting a lion’s share of AI GPU revenue for at least the next 2-3 years and in fact when AMD guided to about only $2Bn in AI/GPU revenue for 2024, during their last earnings call in Oct,  I felt it was too little to buy AMD at that time. Besides the hardware, Nvidia’s moat is CUDA, its operating system, which really makes its GPU’s so much more powerful. I didn’t see AMD getting much traction on that account.

However, that was a mistake as it turned out to be a conservative estimate.

This is from UBS analysts:

Recent channel and customer checks confirmed their view that AMD has a firm demand commitment for more than 400,000 MI300A/X units for 2024, the analysts said. This is a number that is fairly consistent with where the analysts have seen demand since last summer but they have been wary of double ordering and unsure of supply.

The analysts added that after having gone back to several customers and suppliers, they are more confident that these units are real and AMD now has sufficient Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate capacity to do over 10% the volumes of Nvidia (NVDA).

*Even assuming a very conservative average selling price (which could be as high as $20,000 or more for some customers), this suggests $5B for data center GPU revenue is a pedestrian target for this year. Even this implies AMD exits the year at a *run-rate which could be close to $10B per year* with AMD still likely to grow GPU units quarter-over-quarter through much of 2025, the analysts added.

AMD has already moved up from $135 this month to $177 and it lost a little bit after Intel’s poor guidance. I’m going to start buying this slowly – knowing fully well that I’m late but I do believe in its long term story and the $10Bn run rate is an excellent number – If we believe in the AI story and the resulting surge in its building blocks, there there is no way only one company, Nvidia can supply to the entire market – AMD will get a decent foothold. I’m anticipating +$8 in earnings two years out, that should be priced at 30x or $240, which is still 36% higher than today’s price, nothing to be sneezed at.

Citigroup (NYSE:C) stock rose 1.8% in Friday premarket trading after the bank said it expects 2024 revenue to increase to about $80B-$81B from $78.5B in 2023, driven by gains in treasury and trade solutions, securities services, a rebound in investment banking and wealth, and lower partner payments in retail services. The revenue outlook excludes markets and divestitures.

Net interest income, excluding markets, is expected to decline modestly as global interest rates fall. Citi (C) expects mid-single-digit loan growth, driven by its card business and modest operating deposit growth, it said in its earnings slides.

Citibank’s adjusted earnings also beat expectations, but they expect only 2% revenue growth for 2024 and a modest decline in NII. Their allowance for losses was $397 Mn so no dire warnings there either.

Wells Fargo also beat adjusted earnings and revenue expectations but is more pessimistic for 2024. It expects net interest income to be about 7%-9% lower than 2023’s $52.4B level on lower interest rates, an expected decline in average loans, and further attrition in Consumer Banking and Lending deposits. Their provision for credit losses was $1.28B, higher than the other two but below expectations. *Q4 net loan charge-off, as a percentage of average total loans, of 0.53% vs. 0.36% in the prior quarter and 0.23% a year ago.*

Percentage of loans charged-off is a key measure to monitor; in Wells Fargo’s case it was double of the previous year’s – will need to keep a strict watch on this.