Fountainheadinvesting

Fountainhead Investing

Menu
Menu

Tag: Investment Strategy

Categories
Industrials

Rolls-Royce RYCEY ($6.85) Phoenix Rising From The Ashes

Turnarounds rarely succeed. Ask Warren Buffet, who tried his best to turn around textiles major Berkshire Hathaway, which was suffering from a barrage of cheaper imports (sound familiar?) before giving up and turning it into the holding company and investment giant that is today. Rolls-Royce (RYCEY) is in the midst of one in the cutthroat world of aerospace engineering and manufacturing and is having a banner year with its stock up 82% to date.

Can it continue or sink under its three difficult cyclical segments, aerospace, defense, and power with low margins and tough competition? –

A year and a half ago, CEO Tufan Erginbilgic took over a struggling company with pandemic-induced challenges, operational inefficiencies, and persistent financial setbacks. His approach was bold and uncompromising: radical cost-cutting, operational streamlining, and a laser-focused strategy to transform Rolls-Royce’s fundamental business model. He did admirably, trimming the workforce by 6% and reducing expenses by £400 million. He also raised prices, optimized procurement processes, and renegotiated contracts.

As a result, in the first 6 months of 2024, Rolls-Royce did an excellent job with

  • 19% revenue growth to £8.18Bn
  • 74% increase in operating profit to £1.2Bn, with an OPM of 14%
  • Free cash flow improvement by 225% to £1.2Bn
  • Net debt reduced to its lowest level in five years to £822 million

The turnaround was led by Civil Aerospace (its largest division), and the strongest performer with 27% revenue growth, which benefited from post-pandemic air travel recovery. What’s more, its higher-margin service revenues also grew 27% to 68% of division sales, indicating a robust and recurring revenue stream. The aerospace segment benefited from strong growth in in-flight hours for engines under long-term service agreements, and large engine deliveries to OEMs increased by 4% with overall OEM deliveries up 26%.

Besides the volume growth, Rolls-Royce also passed on elevated costs, after successfully renegotiating long-term service agreements. Airbus, which saw increased demand for the Trent engines and General Dynamics for its Gulfstream engines, as big customers helped; Competitor General Electric saw its equipment sales fall year-on-year in the second quarter due to lower LEAP engine deliveries.

Defense and Power Systems also showed growth. Defense revenues grew 18%, with strong submarine platform sales and higher service revenue. Power Systems saw a smaller 6% revenue increase, mainly from Datacenters, a segment that certainly holds greater promise.

What does the future look like and can they continue with the turnaround?

Aerospace: Rolls-Royce exclusively provides the engines for the Airbus A350 and A330neo and those airplanes have seen some solid sales momentum which will drive value for the company. The services division will provide better margins

Defense: Given the stronger Republican emphasis on defense, I believe Rolls Royce should see better impetus from defense budgets in the next 4 years.

Power: Data center power needs should be a great opportunity for Rolls-Royce especially with the small modular reactor. The UK government has already picked Rolls-Royce as one of four sources, as has the Czech electricity company, CEZ.

Key Risks:

Execution challenges: This is not their first trip out of the despair well, and once the benefits from cost-cutting dissipate, they still have to grow.

Exposure to global air travel trends, which will slow down after the post-COVID revenge travel boom. Regional revenues were lower and didn’t participate in the post-COVID travel boom.

The company is worth buying: I plan to buy Rolls Royce on declines after such a large run-up for the following reasons.

Reasonable valuation for a GARP (Growth At A Reasonable Price): Analyst consensus estimates call for revenue growth of 8-10% for the next three years at a paltry P/S valuation of just 2.4x sales. Rolls-Royce is also slated to grow EPS by 20% in the next three and has a reasonable P/E of 26, or just 1.3.

Improving margins: Given the improvements in operating margins and the focus on efficiency, margins could improve further and help earnings grow.

Diversification: The company’s diversified portfolio – civil aerospace, defense, and power systems – helps hedge against sector-specific cyclicality.

Datacenter Opportunity: I also believe that Datacenter requirements for power will be a big winner for Rolls-Royce.

Dividends: They’re also reinstating dividends at 30% of after-tax profits, which should provide a floor for the stock price.

Categories
Market Outlook

Market Outlook – The Case For Market Breadth

The Russell 2000 (IWM) ETF and the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index have been outperforming the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite since the election. Last week was no exception.

The IWM comprises 2,000 of the smallest capitalized companies in the market.

The IWM has gained 8.5% compared to the S&P 500’s and the Nasdaq Composite’s 4.5% gain since Nov 4th, 2024, and 4.5% in the last week, significantly higher than the 1.7% each gained by its larger counterparts.

Last week, breadth was better across the board. The NYSE Advance/Decline Ratio or $ADRN, finished on Friday 11/22 at 3.6, (3.6 stocks advancing V 1 decline), it averaged 2.29 for the past week, and 1.81 since the Nov 5th election against an average of 1.61 for the Year To Date.

Clearly, everyone wants in and has been wanting in since the election – money has shifted from chasing the M-7 and other large caps to a larger pool of small-cap stocks. The markets have aggressively seized that opportunity and have bid them faster than the large caps. Is the breadth a bullish sign or is the euphoria unsettling?

Let’s look at some of the main reasons:

Business-Friendly Populist Government: To some extent, there is a perception that small caps are closer to the economy than the M-7, and other tech behemoths, which explains why the prospects of tax cuts, pro-business policies, and less regulation would improve their fortunes much more than the large caps.

Small Caps are cheaper: Large-cap tech is also perceived to be much more expensive – the average earnings multiples are lower for small caps.

Everybody and their uncle owns Nvidia: Investors and traders are likely overexposed to big-tech stocks and need to diversify, but were afraid to do so. A Bank of America study found “Long M-7” the most crowded trade in the markets just two weeks back.

Animal spirits are up: More risk-taking, Hell the markets are likely to go up with the pro-market Trump administration and I should add. Consumer sentiment seems to have boomed since the election.

FOMO – The small caps are up and I don’t have exposure, I need to jump on this train.

Should we remain invested or does breadth call for caution?

Business-Friendly Populist Government: I agree with the tax cuts and deregulation, but we need to see if the proposed tariff plans could derail this.

Small Caps are cheaper: Small caps may be cheaper, but if you take out the premium that should go to secular growers with sustainable competitive advantages, and look at the risks associated with smaller, struggling businesses, the difference is not that stark, and sometimes it’s the opposite. Some businesses are just terrible, with no competitive advantages, and low prospects of growth, and their stock prices are driven purely by momentum. These are risky businesses you don’t want to own, period. For now, I believe this rotation may continue for a few weeks more, but the bottom line — if I’m looking at a small cap or even a small cap index, I’m going to look at the underlying fundamentals before making a call. I’m not riding any gravy trains here.

Everybody and their uncle owns Nvidia: That is true – the overownership is well documented, and when there is overownership, the scope to continue rising is much, much lower. To some extent, the earnings have to catch up with the valuation or the stock will just drift, and you’ll find large-cap investors rotating into small-caps.

Animal spirits are up: Drill, Baby, Drill, DOGE, etc, all sound great during the honeymoon period, but the jury is still out, we’ll have to see how everything works in 2025. I’m on the fence on this, it’s still a show-me story, and the possibilities of this going south are not small.

FOMO: This I am seeing first hand – For example, Navitas (NVTS) one of my weak small-cap picks, which sank from $4 to $1.60, has suddenly bounced back from the dead to $2.40 in a week! I’m not going to look a gift horse in the mouth, I didn’t add but I’m hoping it bounces back to at least where I can exit. Navitas is actually in the right place at the right time – its focus is on power saving for data centers, which could be a huge business, but it’s currently, heavily exposed to China with 57% of sales there, (it is in 60% of all the cell phones in the world). Besides Navitas, several other stocks popped in the previous week, without any changes in fundamentals.

Conclusion

Breadth is good for the market, just not at the expense of the usual due diligence.

All five reasons helped a fundamentally sound, and highly high-quality small-cap stock like Confluent, (CFLT) a favorite, that I’ve owned and written about. It’s a $1Bn revenue company with an $8Bn market cap, which shot up from $27.50 to $31.50 in the past week for several reasons.

The business-friendly and animal spirits bounce – because now enterprises seem to be spending; The halo effect from Snowflake (SNOW) the 4x larger data warehousing, market leader had a great quarter and guidance last week; Confluent, which serves the same enterprise market with data streaming is also being seen as a beneficiary and now gets the higher multiple.

The over-ownership bounce: I would rather add more Confluent and Klaviyo (KVYO) shares because my portfolio already has high exposure to large caps.

Small Caps could continue to outperform in the near term, just to catch up. As we saw from the chart, on a YTD basis they’re still behind at 19% to 25%.

Categories
AI Cloud Service Providers Technology

Alphabet (GOOG) $165, Beset By Legal Issues Could Stay Range-Bound

An interesting article in the Wall Street Journal discusses Google’s anti-trust case in more detail. Quoting from the article:

“Some of the DOJ’s proposals were expected, such as the divestiture of the Chrome browser and a ban on payments to Apple AAPL in exchange for default or preferred placement of Google’s search engine on Apple’s devices”, which are minor and something Google could take in its stride.

But the government’s proposal of “Restoring Competition Through Syndication And Data Access”, could be more harmful in the long run.

Restoring competition through access, which involves Google providing its search index—essentially the massive database it has about all sites on the web—to rivals and potential rivals at a “marginal cost.”, in my opinion, is stripping Google of its IP, and competitive advantages, which it has built through decades of human and monetary capital. It is draconian and a massive overreach. It gets worse, if the government has its way, Google would also have to give those same parties full access to user and advertising data at no charge for 10 years.

For now, it’s a wish list, a starting point of a high ask, which I’m sure the government expects to be whittled down to something less harmful and gives it some bragging rights.

Points to consider

  1. This could harm/scare other tech giants.
  2. The Turney Act makes this government agnostic, it guarantees judicial oversights for antitrust actions.
  3. Alphabet has significant and solid resources and defensible arguments to fight this, mainly the 2 decades of resources put into building this moat.
  4. The stock is likely to stay range-bound or sideways because of the legal issues, where most investors would likely be cautious, even though this morning itself there have been strong buy calls from analysts.

I’m definitely going to hold on. While it is bad news that the DOJ is recommending that Google be forced to sell Chrome, it’s not written in stone, and there’s a small likelihood of it actually happening.

Here are several aspects to consider.

The Chrome divestiture is not devastating: Chrome, if divested could be valued at an estimated $20Bn, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, about 1% of Alphabet’s market cap of $2Tr, so it’s relatively less harmful.

All Roads Lead To Google Search: Even if the spinoff did happen, that doesn’t mean users would ditch Google’s search engine for rivals such as Bing and Safari, which account for less than 15% of the overall market.

The judge is unlikely to take up the recommendation: There is also the possibility the breakup doesn’t happen. Judge Amit Mehta, who will address Google’s illegal monopolization, could follow precedent.

“I think it’s unlikely because Judge Mehta is a very by-the-book kind of judge, and while breakups are a possible remedy under the antitrust laws, they have been generally disfavored over the last 40 years,” said Rebecca Haw Allensworth, a professor and associate dean for research at Vanderbilt Law School, in an email Monday. “He is very interested in following precedent, as was clear from his merits opinion in August, and the most relevant precedent here is Microsoft.”

The chances of an appeal are very strong: In June 2000, a judge ordered the breakup of Microsoft but that decision was later reversed on appeal. Google has stated that would appeal vigorously.

One of the analysts I follow had a fair point about some of Google’s “predatory or abusive” tactics on their ad-tech platforms, for which there are guidelines/rules that can be enforced for specific violations. But to get into a “European” mindset about regulating companies just because they have strong competitive advantages/moats is completely wrong, in my opinion. If Google didn’t pay Apple $20Bn to be its default search engine, Apple users would still prefer Google Search to Safari or Bing – this was in the court documents. Penalizing them (Google) is a massive overreach.

Google built this from scratch with tons of human and financial capital, at a time when there were several larger search engines in a fledgling, growing internet. The iPhone explosion came later. I would be very surprised if the government succeeds in destroying Alphabet.

Here is a sum of the parts valuation, which based on these estimates gives Google a higher valuation than its current market cap of $2.1Tr

Here are the WSJ and Barrons’ articles.

Categories
AI Semiconductors Stocks

Qualcomm, (QCOM) Solid Beat On Turbocharged Auto Sales

Post earnings the stock was up 9% to $188, yesterday, but has given up most of its gains, today. I’m continuing to accumulate.

I’ve owned Qualcomm for a while now, and recommended it in July 2024, and earlier in September 2023, when I wrote a lengthy article on the auto-tech industry. I believe in its long-term strengths and plan to keep the investment for the next three to five years.

Key Strengths include:

  • The Crown Jewel – Its licensing business with its treasure trove of patents generating 70% margins.
  • Strong growth from autos – one of the market leaders with Nvidia and Mobile Eye.
  • Its partnership with Microsoft (MSFT) for AI PCs

Sep Q-2024 Results

QCT sales rose 18% year-over-year to $8.678B.

Within QCT, Auto was the best performer – sales jumped 68% to $899M. This was the biggest surprise as Qualcomm’s auto sales growth cadence is in the mid-thirties. Auto sales tend to be lumpy so this was a really big positive.

Revenue from handsets rose 12% year-over-year to $6.096B. Handsets tend to struggle sometimes –  based on Apple’s fortunes and after drops in the previous year, this was a welcome return to growth.

Its IoT segment has been a slow grower – usually mid-single digits, but it grew 22% this quarter to $1.683Bn. 

Licensing revenue rose 21% year-over-year to $1.521B. Licensing is its most lucrative segment with gross margins over 70% – pretty much its crown jewel.

Q1FY2025 Guidance:

Revenue of $10.5B-$11.3B vs $10.61B consensus. At the midpoint, that’s an increase of 3% Non-GAAP diluted EPS of $2.85-$3.05 vs $2.87 consensus, which at the midpoint is also an increase of 3%. from handsets rose 12% year-over-year to $6.096B.

The CEO, Cristiano Anon, had this to say about the quarter

“We are pleased to conclude the fiscal year with strong results in the fourth quarter, delivering greater than 30% year-over-year growth in EPS,” “We are excited about our recent product announcements at Snapdragon Summit and Embedded World, as they continue to extend our technology leadership and position us well across Handsets, PC, Automotive and Industrial IoT. We look forward to providing an update on our growth and diversification initiatives at our Investor Day on November 19.”

Analysts from UBS and J.P. Morgan upped their price targets, while Barclays analyst Tom O’Malley (who kept his Overweight rating and $200 price target) pointed out that there is now a “bifurcation in Android between the high and low end” and Qualcomm is benefiting both in units and average selling price.

At $180, Qualcomm is very reasonably priced at 16x next year’s estimated earnings and 4x next year’s forecasted sales.

Given its market leadership in auto-tech, AI PCs, and sustainable, and recurring high-margin licensing business, Qualcomm should be priced between 20-22x earnings. It spends a good 25% of its revenues on R&D, which will enable it to continue innovating and growing. Even after that, it still returned $1.6Bn to shareholders with $0.7Bn in share buybacks and $0.9Bn in dividends.

Categories
AI Cloud Service Providers Stocks

Alphabet Deserves A Better Valuation

I had recommended Alphabet (GOOG) as a great long-term buy between $150 and $170 on several occasions.

Last evening, Google knocked it out of the park with really stellar results. I bought more shares this morning, and am reiterating a Buy.

I believe analysts’ consensus earnings are a bit conservative and Google will continue to beat estimates with better growth and operating margins.

Google’s earnings quality is better than several tech giants for the following reasons.

  • It has a near monopoly in Search
  • Market leadership in media with YouTube.
  • A strong first-mover advantage with Waymo.
  • A fast-growing Google Cloud business, third only to and catching up with Azure and AWS.

Its earnings and growth are sustainable, thus it deserves a better valuation and multiple.

Let’s take a closer look at Q3 earnings.

Q3 GAAP EPS came in at $2.12 per share, beating expectations of $1.85 per share $0.27, or 14% – This was a substantial beat.

Revenue of $88.3Bn (+14.9% Y/Y) beat by $2.05B or 3%.

Consolidated Alphabet revenues in Q3 2024 increased 15%, or 16% in constant currency, YoY to $88.3Bn reflecting strong momentum across the business.

Google Services revenues increased 13% to $76.5 billion, led by strength across Google Search & other, Google subscriptions, platforms, and YouTube ads.

Total operating income increased 34% and operating margin percent jumped a huge 4.5% to 32%.

Google Cloud revenues grew a whopping 35% to $11.4Bn led by accelerated growth in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) across AI Infrastructure, Generative AI Solutions, and core GCP products, with record operating margins of 17% as the cost per AI query decreased by 90% over the past 18 months.

Cloud titans Amazon (AWS) and Microsoft (Azure) have commanded huge valuations for their cloud computing businesses; with Google Cloud growing at 35%, it should continue to narrow the gap over the next 5 years. Also importantly, AWS and Azure have operating margins over 30%, and should Google continue to scale and leverage their existing fixed costs, they can reach the same margins. I also believe as they get better at AI, they should be able to charge more.

Based on consensus analysts’ estimates Alphabet’s EPS should grow to $11.60 in 2027 from $5.80 in 2023 – that’s an annual growth rate of 18%. Comparatively, Apple‘s estimated EPS growth through FY2027 is slower at 14%, and it sports a P/E of 33 compared to Google’s 22. Alphabet’s P/E is closer to the S&P 500’s P/E of 21!

I believe this is too low, and there is a lot of potential for its stock to appreciate just on the lower valuation.

Besides the strong EPS, a lot of Google’s expenses are noncash depreciation and amortization and their cash flow margins are strong. They generated operating cash of $31Bn on $88Bn last quarter, or a 35% cash flow margin.

The antitrust regulation will remain a possible negative on Alphabet, but the final decision is still years away as Alphabet vigorously appeals the decision.

I recommend Alphabet as a buy at $176

Categories
Market Outlook

S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite In Free Fall


The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite are in a free fall today with drops of 1.5% and 2.4% respectively, and it’s just 11:30 am. This could develop into a rout as traders and investors turn their noses up at Meta and Microsoft’s earnings. Even Google has given up its 5%. Should Apple and Amazon disappoint post-market today, I think a correction could be on. The main bullish factor countering a volatile election week, a VIX over 21, and a rising 10-year yield at 4.32% were strong earnings, especially from the M-7. Clearly, that doesn’t seem to be happening.
Meta – Initially, it seemed like a perfunctory one percent drop on a small beat and in-line guidance, but it’s gone a lot further as Meta is down 4% to 570.
Why the rout? Analysts and investors panned high Capex plans of $40Bn and costly high-risk bets such as Meta’s Reality Labs unit, (the developer of augmented and virtual reality technologies), which logged a staggering operating loss of $4.4 billion
Microsoft – (down 6% to $408) is getting clobbered for a different reason. Even as Azure grew 34%, the pace wasn’t enough, and guidance of 31% to 32% in constant currency was lower than expected. However, this is due to supply chain constraints as President Amy Hood noted that the 1 or 2-point deceleration Microsoft has guided is mainly due to some supply pushouts, in terms of AI supply coming online that the company counted on. (Read, not as many Blackwells/Hoppers as they would have liked)
“We expect consumption growth to be stable compared to Q1, and we expect to add more sequential dollars to Azure than any other quarter in history,” Hood added.
The indomitable Dan Ives remains as bullish as ever…
“We actually disagree with this initial take as the new Azure reporting standards have moved Street numbers all around and a slight deceleration is totally expected by many investors with some supply constraints and reacceleration in 2H25, and we would be strong buyers of MSFT on any weakness this morning,” Wedbush analysts, led by Daniel Ives, said in a note.

Categories
Semiconductors Stocks

Nvidia (NVDA) Q1-2024 Earnings Preview: High Expectations and Market Optimism

Source: Nvidia

Nvidia Earnings Preview – Q1-2024 

The big event is finally here (Post-market Wednesday, May 22nd) and expectations are sky-high! 

Consensus estimates are for earnings of $5.58 (up 412% YoY) and revenues of $24.6Bn, (up 242% YoY). However, analysts seem to be pointing out that anything less than $5.75 and $26Bn would lead to disappointments. Similarly, expectations for higher guidance for Q2 are also, well, high. Just meeting consensus estimates of $6 per share and $27Bn won’t cut it.

Wall Street remains optimistic – the average price target is $1,040 a 9% upside, with a high of $1,400 from Rosenblatt Securities, who believe that there won’t be any air pockets transitioning from the H(Hopper) series to the B (Blackwell) series, even as AWS this morning confirmed that they would wait for the Blackwell to ship before buying more Hoppers.

Other Wall Street analysts also have higher-than-average targets from $1,100 (Barclays) to $1,200 (Baird).

Seeking Alpha analysts, not to be outdone also talk of the large and growing TAM, with one estimate of $600Bn by 2030, extrapolating growth from the Chips Act, the massive Capital expenditures from mega-caps like Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Oracle, plus the partnership with Dell, new AI use cases and even proxying TSM’s manufacturing capacity. So yes, there are plenty of defensible theories about why this AI gravy train won’t slow down.

For my part, I last bought Nvidia for around $780 on April 22nd, and with a high exposure in it, don’t plan to add more for now. It should remain a very strong, high-conviction, core holding for a long time. I will be looking out for other AI stories.

Categories
Semiconductors Stocks

Nvidia (NVDA) Achieves New Record: Q1 Earnings Beat and Forward Split Announcement

Nvidia (NVDA) Post Market $990 New Record.

  • Another beat, 10:1 forward split new record price, and higher guidance
  • Nvidia press release (NASDAQ: NVDA): Q1 Non-GAAP EPS of $6.12 beats by $0.54.
  • Revenue of $26.04B (+262.2% Y/Y) beats by $1.45B.
  • Record quarterly Data Center revenue of $22.6 billion, up 23% from Q4 and up 427% from a year ago
  • Ten-for-one forward stock split effective June 7, 2024
  • The quarterly cash dividend raised 150% to $0.01 per share on a post-split basis.
  • Q2 Outlook: Revenue is expected to be $28.0 billion vs. consensus of $26.84B, plus or minus 2%.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP gross margins are expected to be 74.8% and 75.5%, respectively, plus or minus 50 basis points. For the full year, gross margins are expected to be in the mid-70% range.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses are expected to be approximately $4.0 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. Full-year operating expenses are expected to grow in the low-40% range.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP other income and expenses are expected to be an income of approximately $300 million, excluding gains and losses from non-affiliated investments.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP tax rates are expected to be 17%, plus or minus 1%, excluding any discrete items.
  • Shares +4.3%.