Fountainheadinvesting

Categories
Market Outlook

A Hawkish Cut

12/17/2024

A Hawkish Cut

As expected the Fed cut interest rates by 0.25% bringing the Fed Funds rate to 4.25% to 4.5% To be sure, this is a hawkish cut. The S&P 500 gave up its gains of 0.5% and has dropped 1.5% in a reversal as has the Nasdaq Composite, down a full 2% to 19,703.

The 10-year treasury yield has shot to 4.5%, a harbinger of how the markets believe that the Feds will have to pay more to finance the deficit, with analysts even talking of 5% – a rate seen last October.

The hawkishness stems from the FOMC Median 2025 PCE Inflation Forecast, which rises to 2.5% vs 2.1%

The median forecast of Fed policymakers for the benchmark rate for the end of next year is now 3.9%. That compares with 3.4% back in September. That suggests 50 basis points of easing compared with 100 basis points in September (including the impact of today’s rate cut).

Today’s cut means policymakers have now lowered their benchmark lending rate by a full percentage point since mid-September. The median estimate of Fed officials now sees just two cuts next year. Most folks were expecting three in the forecast.

Fed officials are tipping an unemployment rate of 4.3% next year a shade higher than the current 4.2%. Chair Powell in the conference that followed stressed that he wanted to ensure that labor markets didn’t get derailed when asked about the need to cut.

The Fed’s policy statement also alluded to a slower pace of cuts by saying “the extent and timing” of additional adjustments would depend on the outlook. This too was stressed in the conference that it would always be new data that would matter.

The neutral rate discussed (the rate at which the economy is neither inflationary nor disinflationary) is now 3%, higher than the original 2%, which the Feds were hoping to achieve by 2024, now highly unlikely before 2027.

Given the strength in the economy, with the GDP at 2.8% and projected to grow above 2% next year, a strong labor market with an unemployment rate of only 4.2%, this is not a bad call and regardless of how the market reacted, the caution to cut slower in 2025 is warranted in my opinion.

Categories
Market Outlook

Positives And Concerns About The Trump Presidency


I’m sure you’ve been inundated with opinions on domestic politics, which is not usually a subject of this investing group. But politics is likely to affect our investment decisions so a note highlighting its impact on business is important.

So far, at, 5,994 the S&P 500 is up 5% from the Nov 4th close of 5,713, and from the forecasts of the likes of Goldman Sachs – we should be crossing 6,300 easily in 2025. Other forecasts have higher targets and we are seeing some of the traditional post-election bounce, a lot of short covering, lower volatility, FOMO, and so on…. It is a good time to be invested now.

There are a few policy areas that will affect equities.

Taxes – A big positive: The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was due to expire on December 31, 2025. It lowered corporate and business income taxes, which was a big positive. The Biden administration was lining up a new set of “tax the rich” proposals, which are now dead. Given the proclivity of the new administration, we should see lower taxes.

Tariffs – A big negative: but could be mitigated: THESE WILL BE HIGHLY INFLATIONARY
The Trump administration could impose tariffs at will by executive order, which is disastrously high. As part of an overall policy to rebalance trade with nations such as China, the tariffs will try to level the playing field.
According to some of the administration’s policy papers, which are part of Project 2025, – granting MFN (Most Favored Nation) status seems to have resulted in chronic U.S. trade deficits with much of the rest of the world, at the expense of American manufacturing; an unfair practice with systemic trade imbalances serving as a brake on GDP growth and capping real wages in the American economy while encumbering the U.S. with significant foreign debt.
This administration will point out China’s quest for global dominance, via protectionism, dumping, and so on, which though debatable, will be the bedrock of its tariff policies. (Who doesn’t love China bashing) The US is on the back foot regarding manufacturing and regardless of whether it is even feasible to reverse overseas manufacturing – this administration will go after it with a vengeance and tariffs will be their biggest tool to get manufacturing jobs back in the US. Tariffs ranging as high as 60% on Chinese goods, a 20% blanket tariff on all imports, and a 100% tariff on automobiles made in Mexico are possible impositions. THESE WILL BE HIGHLY INFLATIONARY
Regardless of the eventual tariffs, they’re bad for some of America’s biggest companies such as Apple (AAPL), Nvidia (NVDA), and Microsoft (MSFT) that rely on Chinese manufacturing for hardware products.
When Trump first imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, he made exceptions for certain consumer goods such as smartphones. Whether that will happen again is unclear.
Besides, we have not even talked about retaliation from global competitors to whom America exports goods and services.
Even as I anticipate tariffs to be a big negative, I’m hoping that wiser counsel prevails or perhaps the stock markets will swoon, which is reportedly a huge factor in this administration’s decisions, and not something they can control. Ironically, a stock market swoon may be the biggest reason for keeping tariffs under control.

Export controls: Some of it is already happening and is unlikely to get worse.

US technology with military applications is already banned from export. But if all exports of US-designed and engineered semiconductors, even those for consumer applications are banned it would hurt Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft. But it would also hurt the trade imbalance that the Trump administration seeks to correct. Very unlikely.

ASML’s (ASML) EUV lithography machines could be a target if the Dutch government complies with restricting sales to allied countries such as Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. Again, unlikely.

Antitrust regulation: Positive for the markets – Under Biden, the government had lurched left, even trying to emulate the EU’s Digital Markets Act. The new administration will likely curtail some of the regulatory excesses, but we’ll have to wait and see if they try to undo recent antitrust litigation against Google (GOOG) and Apple.

Environment, energy, and inflation: More domestic drilling could be a positive, as more domestic oil reduces the need for imports, lowers gas prices, and could result in lower inflation. Its too early to comment on environmental policies and I’ll update at a later date.

Mass DeportationHighly inflationary, when one finds it difficult to fill jobs that Americans are not willing to do. Again – I believe it to be more rhetoric and not likely to be administered en masse, I suspect this could be cosmetic.

For sure, we live in interesting times and the next 4 years should be a roller coaster.

Categories
Market Outlook

July PCE Inline

Inflation monthly report for July as expected, YoY gain slightly better.

  • July Core PCE Price Index: +0.2% M/M vs. +0.2% consensus and +0.2% prior.
  • +2.6% Y/Y vs. +2.7% consensus and +2.6% prior.
  • PCE Price Index: +0.2% M/M vs. +0.2% consensus and +0.1% prior.
  • +2.5% Y/Y vs. +2.5% consensus and +2.5% prior.
  • Personal income: +0.3% M/M vs. +0.2% consensus and +0.2% prior.
  • Personal outlays: +0.5% M/M vs. +0.5% consensus and +0.3% prior.
Categories
Market Outlook

February Jobs Report: Strong Gains Amid Mixed Signals

February Jobs Report

Net job gains 275K, higher than the 200K expected.

Hourly wage gains 0.1%, lower than 0.2% expected.

The two-month payroll revision, though, shows a 167,000 loss

The Unemployment rate rose to 3.9%

The 10-year treasury yield, which started at 4.09 is at 4.05

Yesterday, Powell indicated – Fed ‘not far’ from confidence to cut rates

Categories
Market Outlook

January Inflation Surprises: Rates Climb Above 3%

Inflation rose more than expected in January, still hanging over 3%

  • MoM January Consumer Price Index: +0.3% vs. +0.2% expected and +0.2% in December (revised from +0.3%).
  • YoY +3.1% Y/Y vs. +3.0% expected and +3.4% prior.
  • Core CPI, which excludes food and energy: 
  • MoM+0.4% vs. +0.3% expected and +0.3% prior.
  • YoY +3.9% Y/Y vs. +3.7% expected and +3.9% prior.

The biggest factors:

The shelter index increased 0.6% in Jan. after rising 0.4% in Dec.

Health insurance climbed 1.4% on the month, the most since September 2022. Vehicle insurance rose the same amount, and that’s on top of a long string of outsize gains. The year-on-year increase in car insurance continues to be the biggest since 1976.

Treasury yields soared across the curve. Both two-year and 10-year yields jumped about 15 bps.

The market sees no chance for a rate hike in March. The odds for an increase in May are about 1/3. A hike in June is fully priced in, though.