- Microsoft press release (NASDAQ: MSFT): Q3 GAAP EPS of $2.94 beats by $0.11.
- Revenue of $61.9B (+17.1% Y/Y) beats by $1.01B.
- Shares +5%.
- Revenue in Productivity and Business Processes was $19.6 billion and increased 12% (up 11% in constant currency)
- Revenue in Intelligent Cloud was $26.7 billion and increased 21%
- Revenue in More Personal Computing was $15.6 billion and increased 17%
- Microsoft will provide forward-looking guidance in connection with this quarterly earnings announcement on its earnings conference call and webcast.
Tag: Earnings Report
Intel’s misery continues…
Intel’s (NASDAQ: INTC) significantly weaker-than-expected guidance for the coming quarter overshadowed better-than-expected first-quarter results.
For the coming second quarter, the Pat Gelsinger-led firm expects revenue to be between $12.5B and $13.5B, well below the $13.61B analysts were anticipating.
It also anticipates earning an adjusted $0.10 per share with adjusted gross margins of 403.5% and a tax rate of 13%. Analysts were anticipating adjusted earnings of $0.25 per share.
Shares fell more than 6% in extended-hours trading.
For the period ending March 30, Intel earned an adjusted $0.18 per share on $12.7B in revenue. The quarter is Intel’s first period in changing its reporting structure to focus more on its foundry business. Intel products, which now include client computing, data center, and network and edge, came in at $11.9B, including a 31% year-over-year rise in Client Computing revenue to $7.5B.
Datacenter and AI revenue came in at $3B, while revenue attributed to Mobileye (MBLY) was $239M, down 48% year-over-year. The Network and edge segment generated $1.4B, while the company’s foundry segment saw revenue decline 10% year-over-year to $4.4B.
Analysts expected a year-over-year increase in both the top and bottom lines, with the Pat Gelsinger-led firm expected to earn $0.14 per share on $12.78B in sales.
A consensus of analysts expected Intel to earn an adjusted $0.14 per share on $12.78B in revenue.
Meta Platforms (META)
The bar was too high for Meta to clear.
Post earnings the markets punished it 20% for a marginally weaker guidance and higher than expected CAPEX. Pre-earnings the stock had been up 130% for the past year, so this 20% drop was perhaps, overdue.
Rev beat of 36.46Bn v 36.12Bn 27% YoY – but too little a beat.
Rev guidance 36.5Bn to 39Bn or a midpoint of 37.75 V 38.24, still 18.5% YoY growth but too much of a miss.
Capex is higher at 37.5Bn midpoint now V 33.5Bn – bad for Meta but good for Nvidia/AI most of the Capex is for AI.
META has a GAAP operating profit margin of 49% in the family of apps business – that’s a phenomenal margin, but it drops substantially because of losses in the Reality Labs business. Still, its company-wide margin was 38% – a 52% increase YoY.
Will parse through the earnings call/analysts’ upgrades tomorrow morning, the selloff may be overdone.
Samsara $35.86 (IOT)
Hold for now, 15x sales 26% growth, no adjusted operating profits, but the promise of expansion of fleets and other business benefiting from AI/LLM’s more computing power should help the best IoT in the business. Pure play should be a moat.
Copy from the earnings report about the future growth prospects.
Dell (DELL) $110-$115 Buy 3 Years Annual Return 11-13%+dividends, spread the buying out the stock jumped after hours, but there is still upside left long term.
This is from my October 23 article recommending SMCI – “Super Micro competes with behemoths like Cisco (CSCO), Dell Technologies (DELL), and Lenovo”. However, I didn’t buy Dell subsequently, their infrastructure solutions group is about 40% of their revenue and servers half of that – I wanted to see more evidence that they would be getting meaningful revenue from the datacenter boom.
This quarter they did as Dell’s Infrastructure Solutions Group produced $9.3B in revenue up 10% from the prior quarter. Servers and networking revenue hit $4.9B, driven primarily by AI-optimized servers. Projected growth in unstructured data from AI should benefit Dell’s storage business as enterprise and large corporate customers are in the early stages of AI adoption. AI-optimized server orders increased by nearly 40% sequentially, $800 million of AI-optimized servers, and backlog nearly doubled sequentially, exiting the fiscal year at $2.9 billion.
From their earnings call “Demand continued to outpace GPU supply, though we are seeing H100 lead times improving. We are also seeing strong interest in orders for AI-optimized servers equipped with the next generation of AI GPUs, including the H200 and the MI300X.”
Even after this quarter AI related revenue is less than 10% but growth will come from 3 areas, servers, storage and services.
Company wide revenue growth is expected to be only mid single digits this year, with better growth of 7-8% in the years 2025 and 2026.
I estimate earnings to grow much faster at around 12% for the next three years. As a cyclical, Dell gets low multiples and I wouldn’t assign more than 16x, so at 2026 earnings of $10, we should target a price of $160. About 12% a year.
Nvidia’s results exceeded expectations as usual, kind of becoming a habit! The previous quarter’s (Jan 2024) revenue beat by $1.6Bn and it guided Q1-FY25 (April 2024) revenue 10% or 2Bn higher to $22Bn.
Shares took off from $675 to $725. Everybody’s happy.
Now comes the tough part.
Nvidia had a net profit margin of 55% = $12.2Bn in profits on $22Bn in sales. That is drug lord margin territory! Simply, they can charge whatever they want for the H100s, the new Grace Hopper, and the H200s that are coming down the pike. I’m confident that these margins will continue for at least a year untill competitors get their act together.
However, to assume that these margins will continue beyond that is difficult to swallow, and most of the street estimates for earnings are based on at least 52% in NPM, which if not achieved can be a huge disappointment.
So I modeled earnings at a 40% Net Profit Margin, which is similar to a big pharma company’s patented drug margin that also charges as much as the market can pay for it.
With that NPM, Earnings come down naturally; three years down the road in the 40% model, EPS is $26 compared to the street estimate of $33. Assigning a P/E of 40, that gets us to $1,030 from today’s price of $725 or an annualized gain of 12%. And if the street is correct, we’re looking at 40*33 =$1,320 or an annualized gain of 22%.
The counter argument to the lower margin thesis is – Nvidia can lower prices and sell more, and at some point this is likely to happen – the overall growth doesn’t reduce – especially if you’re changing the whole paradigm of accelerated computing replacing the way data centers are built now.
At the moment, I’m not planning to add any more, my exposure to Nvidia is already very high, and the long-term thesis doesn’t change.
FactSet reported the following for S&P 500 earnings through 2/9.
This is a very helpful 10,000 feet view and provides good benchmarking and comparisons.
Earnings Scorecard: For Q4 2023 (with 67% of S&P 500 companies reporting actual results), 75% of S&P 500 companies have reported a positive EPS surprise, which is below the 5-year average of 77% but above the 10-year average of 74%
Earnings Growth: For Q4 2023, the blended (year-over-year) earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 is 2.9%. If 2.9% is the actual growth rate for the quarter, it will mark the second-straight quarter that the index has reported earnings growth.
65% of S&P 500 companies have reported a positive revenue surprise, which is below the 5-year average of 68% but above the 10-year average of 64%.
In aggregate, companies are reporting revenues that are 1.2% above the estimates, which is below the 5-year average of 2.0% and below the 10-year average of 1.3%.
If 3.9% is the actual revenue growth rate for the quarter, it will mark the 13th consecutive quarter of revenue growth for the index.
It is interesting to note that analysts were projecting record-high EPS for the S&P 500 of $243.41 in CY 2024 and $275.34 in CY 2025 on February 8.
On February 8, the forward 12-month P/E ratio for the S&P 500 was 20.3, which marked the seventh time in the past nine trading days in which the P/E ratio for the index was above 20.0. How does this 20.3 P/E ratio compare to historical averages?
Here is the chart for the historical PE, we have been above the 10 year average of around 18 for a while, and are now above the 5-year average of 19 as well.
Great Expectations. Hi everyone. Sometimes, stocks get ahead of themselves.
Late Tuesday, three of the biggest names in technology—Alphabet, Microsoft, and Advanced Micro Devices—reported December quarter results and offered the latest updates on their AI progress.
While the headline numbers were generally solid, they weren’t good enough to impress investors given the stocks’ big runs.
Microsoft had the best quarter of the bunch, reporting earnings per share of $2.93, well ahead of the analyst consensus of $2.76. Alphabet beat profit estimates, posting EPS of $1.64 versus the consensus of $1.59. AMD’s profit was in line with the estimates, but the company’s revenue outlook was disappointing.
All three stocks were down in mid-day trading Wednesday. Alphabet shares dropped 6%, AMD slipped 3%, and Microsoft was down 1.4%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite was off 1.6%.
The main problem with the reports wasn’t the numbers but the expectations going in. Take AMD’s AI chip outlook. On last night’s conference call with investors, CEO Lisa Su said that AMD now expects revenue for its AI data center MI300 GPU products to surpass $3.5 billion in 2024—up from a $2 billion forecast just three months ago. While the guidance is up significantly, some Wall Street analysts had estimates of up to $8 billion.
Investors would be wise to largely overlook these day-to-day stock movements. The technology companies’ conviction over future AI demand is more important. And, given the latest commentary about capital expenditure budgets, the robust trend is intact.
Microsoft said its expects capex to “increase materially” in the current quarter, and it intends to invest aggressively in the coming quarters. Alphabet said its capex would be “notably larger” in 2024 versus the prior year. Both companies said infrastructure investments are being driven by trends in AI demand.
There’s other evidence the AI arms race is still on beyond the comments from Microsoft and Alphabet. On Monday, Super Micro—a leading independent manufacturer of high-end AI servers for data centers— easily beat expectations and raised its full-year revenue guidance by nearly 40%. Last week, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told reporters in Taiwan that demand for AI GPUs is still outstripping supply, while adding 2024 is going to be a “huge year.”
Finally, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg boasted on social media earlier this month that his company will have 350,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs—and almost 600,000 H100 equivalent GPUs based on total computing power—by the end of this year.
We’ll find out more when Meta, Amazon, and Apple report on Thursday, but all signs suggest that AI spending is still accelerating—no matter what stocks said on Wednesday.
Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) shares rose 2.7% in extended trading on Wednesday after the semiconductor company reported fiscal first-quarter results and guidance that topped expectations.
For the period ending Dec. 24, Qualcomm earned $2.75 per share on $9.92B V consensus estimates of $2.37 per share on $9.52B in revenue.
QCT revenue rose 7% year-over-year to $8.4B.
Revenue from handsets rose 16% year-over-year to $6.69B
Automotive sales jumped 31% to $598M. – this will be Qualcomm’s biggest growth catalyst.
Sales from IoT plunged 32% to $1.13B.
Licensing revenue fell 4% year-over-year to $1.46B.
Revenue and Earnings Midpoint Guidance is higher at$9.3Bn and $2.3 for the next quarter.
Qualcomm said it expects to earn between $2.20 and $2.40 per share, with revenue forecast between $8.9B and $9.7B. Analysts were expecting $2.25 per share in earnings and $9.28B in revenue.
Microsoft (MSFT) Hold $407
Earnings: $2.93 per share, vs. $2.78 per share expected, 33% Higher YoY
Revenue: $62.02 billion, vs. $61.12 billion expected, 18% Higher YoY.
CLOUD DOES WELL – Intelligent Cloud revenue $25.88Bn V 25.29Bn expected, 20% Higher YoY contains Azure cloud infrastructure, SQL Server, Windows Server, Nuance, GitHub and enterprise services. Within that segment, revenue from Azure and other cloud services grew 30%. Analysts polled by CNBC had expected 27.7% growth, and the StreetAccount consensus was 27.5%. The metric for the previous quarter was 29%.
This is impressive growth – but most of it is already in the current price.
I own Microsoft but haven’t had a chance to add Microsoft during this rally, and it’s already up 9% this year.
The guidance will be out during the earnings call starting at 5:30 and will update after the call.